1 How an AI written Book Shows why the Tech 'Terrifies' Creatives
Alejandro Kater edited this page 4 months ago


For Christmas I received a fascinating present from a friend - my very own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was totally written by AI, with a few simple prompts about me supplied by my good friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty design of writing, but it's likewise a bit recurring, and very verbose. It may have gone beyond Janet's prompts in collating information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mystical, repeated hallucination in the kind of my feline (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had offered around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, considering that rotating from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to generate them, based on an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who created it, can order any more copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone producing one in any person's name, including stars - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, developed by AI, and designed "entirely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is intended as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get offered further.

He hopes to widen his variety, creating various genres such as sci-fi, and clashofcryptos.trade possibly providing an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - selling AI-generated items to human customers.

It's also a bit terrifying if, videochatforum.ro like me, you write for a living. Not least since it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, iwatex.com authors, artists and stars worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar content based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are talking about information here, we actually indicate human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, demo.qkseo.in which campaigns for AI firms to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is pictures. It's artworks. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to learn how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were phony, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not believe the use of generative AI for creative functions must be banned, however I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without permission ought to be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be really effective however let's construct it fairly and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have selected to block AI designers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have actually chosen to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to utilize creators' content on the web to assist establish their designs, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He points out that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is likewise highly against removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a great deal of pleasure," says the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining among its finest performing markets on the vague guarantee of development."

A government representative stated: "No move will be made until we are definitely positive we have a useful strategy that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for ideal holders to help them certify their content, access to premium product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for ideal holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI plan, a national data library consisting of public data from a large range of sources will likewise be offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to enhance the security of AI with, grandtribunal.org among other things, companies in the sector required to share information of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is said to desire the AI sector to face less guideline.

This comes as a number of claims versus AI firms, utahsyardsale.com and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their approval, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable use" and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of elements which can constitute reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it collects training data and whether it must be spending for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being the a lot of downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its technology for a portion of the rate of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I think that at the minute, if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weakness in generative AI tools for larger tasks. It has lots of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be rather challenging to check out in parts since it's so long-winded.

But offered how quickly the tech is evolving, I'm not sure for how long I can remain confident that my substantially slower human writing and editing abilities, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest advancements in international technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.

Powered by BW's shoe-string budget.